Libra scores academic papers across 28 mathematical dimensions. Transparent. Reproducible. Every score public. Every decision on the record.
Submit a paper. Libra analyzes every equation, every citation, every statistical test, every claim. 28 dimensions of mathematical verification — from semantic consistency to proof validity to whether the conclusions actually follow from the evidence.
Results in hours. Not months.
Publishers say peer review takes 6–8 weeks. The data says 3–12 months. They say their process is rigorous. 63,000+ retractions say otherwise. Libra pulls public data from Crossref, OpenAlex, and Retraction Watch and shows exactly where the system fails.
Every number backed by data. Every claim verifiable.
| Publisher | Claimed Review | Actual Median | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Elsevier | 6–8 weeks | 147 days | 12,400+ |
| Springer Nature | 4–6 weeks | 168 days | 8,200+ |
| Wiley | 6–10 weeks | 193 days | 5,100+ |
Every Libra score can be challenged by anyone — with evidence. Authors respond publicly. All exchanges permanent. No anonymous gatekeeping. No private rejections. No papers vanishing because one reviewer had a bad day.
Science is a conversation. Libra makes it public.
"The p-value in Table 3 appears to be post-hoc adjusted. The original analysis plan registered on OSF specifies a different primary endpoint."
Dr. R. Chen · March 15, 2026"Correct — Table 3 reflects exploratory analysis. We've updated the manuscript to clearly label it as such. Primary endpoint results are in Table 2."
Authors · March 16, 2026Researchers write for free. Reviewers review for free. Publishers charge universities $10K–$30K per journal per year to read the results. On a product made entirely by unpaid academics. Profit margins: 30–40%. Higher than Apple's.
It cares whether the paper is true.